Legal Opinion

LaFontaine v. Southern Underwriters Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1880PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Rule upon a witness to show cause why he should not be attached for contempt in refusing to answer certain questions, heard at January Special Term, 1880, of Wake Superior Court, before Avery, J. This was a proceeding supplementary to execution, and on the 10th. of April, 1878, an order was made by the judge of the superior court, requiring George W. Blacknall, the treasurer and managing agent of the defendant association, to appear before a referee who was appointed to take…

Read the full summary

Rule upon a witness to show cause why he should not be attached for contempt in refusing to answer certain questions, heard at January Special Term, 1880, of Wake Superior Court, before Avery, J. This was a proceeding supplementary to execution, and on the 10th. of April, 1878, an order was made by the judge of the superior court, requiring George W. Blacknall, the treasurer and managing agent of the defendant association, to appear before a referee who was appointed to take and certify the examination of said Blacknall and such other witnesses as may be brought before him, to make discovery…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

In executing tlie order under which the referee is directed “to take and certify the examination of George W. Blacknall and such other witnesses as may be required to appear before him ” to make discovery and to examine concerning the property and rights of the said defendant, certain interrogatories were propounded to the witness named, which he declined to answer. These interrogatories, numbered consecutively'from 2 to 22 inclusive, omitting those numbered 3 and 4 as not material, are as follows:

2nd question. “ Have you the books mentioned in the subpoena and belonging to the Southern…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pain v. . PainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Lathrop v. . ClappNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Moore v. HitchcockNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Forbes v. WillardNew York Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. ThadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Bedgood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bradley Fertilizer Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. Stone v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API