Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Willard

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

UPON" the examination of the defendant before a referee, in proceedings supplementary to execution, the following interrogatories were propounded to him by the plaintiff’s counsel, viz: 1st. Whether he had seen the plaintiff, about the middle of December, 1865? 2d. Whether, about that time, he received from him, at Toronto, about $3060, in Canada, currency ? 3d. Whether he received any, and if any, how much money, in Canada, in December, 1865 ? 4th.

Read the full summary

UPON" the examination of the defendant before a referee, in proceedings supplementary to execution, the following interrogatories were propounded to him by the plaintiff’s counsel, viz: 1st. Whether he had seen the plaintiff, about the middle of December, 1865? 2d. Whether, about that time, he received from him, at Toronto, about $3060, in Canada, currency ? 3d. Whether he received any, and if any, how much money, in Canada, in December, 1865 ? 4th. Whether he had in his possession, in December, 1865,- money or currency amounting to $3000 ? 5th. What money, in bills or coin, he paid out or…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Daniels, J.

The plaintiff’s counsel objected, upon the argument of the present appeal, that the order made by the county judge was not appealable, and relied upon Mitchel’s case (12 Abb. 249) in support of the objection. That ease affords the plaintiff no assistance whatsoever in that respect. It was an appeal taken in a proceeding against an attorney, for a contempt in the course of the trial of an issue of fact, And the order of the court made’in that proceeding was held not to be appealable; The question whether an order made for the punishment of a party for not answering in…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. LaFontaine v. Southern Underwriters Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Hagerman v. Tong LeeNevada Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Stuart v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. In re TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Youngs v. YoungsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API