Troianowski v. Troianowski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The husband in his libel in this divorce case alleged his wife was guilty of cruel and barbarous treatment, indignities, and desertion. Judge Soffel, who heard the case without a jury, held that libellant had failed to establish either desertion or cruel and barbarous treatment, but granted the divorce on the ground of indignities. Respondent appealed.
We concur with the conclusion reached by the learned trial judge, who had the advantage of seeing the parties and hearing their testimony. We have been mindful in our careful study of this record that isolated instances of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Davidsen v. DavidsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Trussell v. TrussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Knox v. KnoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Fisher v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bobst v. BobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Megoulas v. MegoulasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Smith v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Jenkins v. Jenkins, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Huntingdon County1983