Fisher v. Fisher
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
The wife, appellant, seeks a divorce for cruelty and indignities. The master recommended a decree for indignities, but before the final rule was issued respondent was committed to the Norristown State Hospital. A committee ad litem was appointed to represent his interests. The respondent never entered an appearance or presented a defense before the master or the court below, but, upon the intervention of members of his family, the court recommitted the case to the master to take further testimony, and a divorce was again recommended. Exceptions to the master’s supplemental…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davidsen v. DavidsenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Schulze v. SchulzeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Viney v. VineySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Ford v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Ponthus v. PonthusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Megoulas v. MegoulasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Boggs v. BoggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Reddick v. ReddickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Hughes v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Troianowski v. TroianowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.