Fellows v. Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs Oliver and Georgiann Fellows petitioned for review of an order of Judge Henry C. Keene, limiting their potential recovery in this action from third-party defendant Sitka Telephone Company (Sitka) to $71,618.50. This figure represents one-half of the amount paid directly to the Fellows by the Tlingit-Haida Regional Electrical Authority (THREA) pursuant to their settlement agreement. Primarily at issue here is the effect of that agreement, in which THREA assigned to the Fellows all rights that THREA might have against Sit-ka, including any right to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manson-Osberg Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Golden Valley Electric Ass'n v. City Electric Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Criterion Insurance Co. v. LaitalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. Wien Air Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ogle v. Craig Taylor Equipment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Deal v. KearneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Tommy's Elbow Room, Inc. v. KavorkianAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Robinson v. U-Haul Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1992
- Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc. v. State of Alaska, Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC, and Flint Hills Resources, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.