Legal Opinion

Fry v. Gallaspie

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this action, the appellee, as plaintiff, sued the appellants, as defendants, in the court below, in a complaint of two paragraphs, to each of Avhich paragraphs the appellants demurred for the Avant of sufficient facts therein to constitute a cause of action.

The demurrer to the first paragraph Avas overruled, and to this decision the appellants excepted, and the demurrer to the second paragraph was sustained.

To the first paragraph of the complaint the appellants answered in íavo paragraphs, the first being a general denial, and the second setting up an affirmative defence.

The appellee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Splahn v. GillespieIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Stockton v. StocktonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Johnson v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hume v. ConduittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McConnell v. HannahIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Willard v. BringolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Nietert v. TrentmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API