Legal Opinion

City of Marshall v. Adkins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Harrison County. Tried below before Hon. W. C. Buford.

1Opinion of the Court

LEYT, Associate Justice.

On March 27, 1906, the city council of the city of Marshall duly adopted an ordinance granting to J. L. Breathwit and B. D. Elmore, and their successors and assigns, the right for a period of thirty years to use .the streets and alleys of the city to maintain and operate a gas plant and mains as a public utility in the city. Section 7 of the ordinance required the grantees, and their successors and assigns, to have the plant in complete operation under the franchise to supply gas to the inhabitants of the city within twenty-four months from the date of their '…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Nilson v. JonesboroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  3. Malone v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Watts v. Corner, Walker & DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. La Villa Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  2. Stewart v. BaseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. City of Topeka v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Sanders Nursery Co. v. J. C. Engelman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API