Legal Opinion
O'CALLAGHAN v. Sifre
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 11, 2008No. 05 Civ 7437PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Pro se plaintiff Daniel J. O’Callaghan (“O’Callaghan”) brought this action invoking the Court’s diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) alleging injuries allegedly stemming from misconduct by defendants Adam Sifre (“Sifre”) and James Iniguez (“Iniguez”) (collectively “Defendants”), who are attorneys, in violation of New York Judiciary Law § 487 (“§ 487”). O’Callaghan’s action arises from statements made by Defendants orally in court and in counterclaims they filed in connection with legal proceedings as attorneys for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- DeLuca v. LordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Greene v. WCI Holdings Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ray v. WatnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Polanco v. NCO Portfolio Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Alliance Network, LLC v. Sidley Austin LLPNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- Rice v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Samms v. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.