Commonwealth v. Dickerson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
This case requires the interpretation of two provisions of the Sentencing Code — mandatory minimum sentencing for repeat offenders and computation of prior record score under the sentencing guidelines. The sentencing court held that enhanced sentencing provisions applied at appellee’s second sentencing even though he had committed the second offense prior to his conviction for the first. The Superior Court reversed, holding that the enhanced sentencing provisions could not be imposed unless the second offense was committed after conviction for the first…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. SuttonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. AkbarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. ArmstrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.