Legal Opinion

Quan Wo Chung & Co. v. Laumeister

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1890No. 13651PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for writ of mandate to the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

his is a proceeding by mandamus upon the following case: —

In an action to recover possession of certain real property situate in San Francisco, in which one Lee Chuck was plaintiff and the above-named petitioners were defendants, the superior court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, whereupon a writ of restitution *385was issued, under which petitioners were ejected from the demanded premises, and said Lee Chuck placed in possession. The petitioners afterward moved the superior court to restore them to possession, on the ground that the writ of restitution had been wrongfully executed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong Co.California Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Magnaud v. TraegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Lehman-Durr Co. v. FolmarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Johnston v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API