Legal Opinion

Lehman-Durr Co. v. Folmar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 28, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. L. H. Gardner. Bill by .Lehman-Durr Company against George A. Folmar and others to set aside a fraudulent conveyance and cross bill in the nature of set-off. See also 154 Ala, 480, 45 South. 289. From a. decree for respondents complainants appeal. There is no question about the rig'ht of appeal in a decree of this character.— 18 Ene.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Montgomery Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. L. H. Gardner. Bill by .Lehman-Durr Company against George A. Folmar and others to set aside a fraudulent conveyance and cross bill in the nature of set-off. See also 154 Ala, 480, 45 South. 289. From a. decree for respondents complainants appeal. There is no question about the rig'ht of appeal in a decree of this character.— 18 Ene. P. & P. 896; Bridgeport I. Co. v. Bridgeport L. Go., 104 Ala. 281; Thornton v. R. R. C'o., 94 Ala. 354; R. R. Co. v. Sibert, 97 Ala. 393; Malone’s Case, 84 Ala. 489; Walker’s Case, 70 Ala. 571; Jones v.…

1Opinion of the CourtMayfield, J.

The case on appeal is thus correctly and succinctly stated by counsel for appellant:

“Lehman-Durr Company filed a bill to set aside a fraudulent conveyance executed by Folmar to his children. There was a final decree in favor of the complainant, and the property alleged to have been fraudulently conveyed was put up for sale under the decree. George A. Folmar filed a cross-bill in the main cause, in which he alleged that, when he executed the notes on *327which the suit was founded, to Lehman-Durr Company, the latter had agreed to transfer to him all the collaterals which it had held for a certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haebler v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Smith v. GayleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Walker v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Ex parte Walter Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Wright v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carl v. DetoffolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Jones v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Carroll v. DraughonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Marshall & Spencer Co. v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. St. Regis Paper Co. v. KerlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API