Kenimer v. State Ex Rel. Webb
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
1. We are faced at the outset with the necessity to determine the effect of the rulings on the demurrers and motion to quash. If the demurrers and motion to quash properly raised the question whether the petition charged only one act of contempt or two hundred and thirty-eight, the rulings thereon became the law of the case and this court is precluded from further consideration of the question. We think that the demurrers and the motion to quash did properly raise the question and that the rulings, unexcepted to, became the law of the case. The court had jurisdiction of the parties and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Ex Parte GenecovTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Griffin v. EavesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Brannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Close v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.