Close v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
This case presents the issue of whether a criminal defendant who is sentenced pursuant to the erime of violence statute, section 16-11-309(1)(a), 6 C.R.S. (2001), is entitled, upon request, to a proportionality review of his sentence, and, if so, what is the proper scope of such proportionality review. The trial court declined to conduct a proportionality review of defendant Close's sixty-year sentence. The court of appeals affirmed. People v. Close, 22 P.3d 983, 989 (Colo.Ct. App.2000). Both courts based their conclusion on the fact that the sixty-year sentence was the mandatory minimum…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. StrockColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. BorghesiSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Lucero v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- People v. DerouletSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.