Legal Opinion
Mundy v. Pro-Thro Enterprises
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided January 7, 2011No. BV028728PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DYMANT, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Thomas Mundy, a disabled person, sought to recover damages from defendant and respondent Pro-Thro Enterprises for denying him full and equal access to its business location. Following *Supp. 3a court trial, judgment was entered in favor of respondent. Appellant contends that he was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law and that the court abused its discretion in admitting various items of evidence. We find no basis for relief on appeal and affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
On December 22, 2008, appellant filed a complaint against respondent for a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Munson v. Del Taco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Huffman v. INTERSTATE BRANDS COMPANIESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Garcia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In Re Estate of OdianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Carmen RosasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Jerry Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Landis' Labyrinth v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025