Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Little

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided May 18, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00001Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO RICHARD F. BYRD, Case No. 1:21-cv-00001-DCN Plaintiff, vs. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER BRADLEY J. LITTLE and DAVE JEPPESEN., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. 28. While originally opposing the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 33), Plaintiff Richard Byrd recently filed his own Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 41(a)(2). Dkt. 39. Because Byrd has filed this Motion, the Court could simply dismiss the case without further analysis. It will dismiss the case to be sure,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API