Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided August 4, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order entered September 2,1992 affirmed, with $10 costs.

During the time period relevant to this appeal defendant Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase) operated a pharmacy and drug store at its New York headquarters at One Chase Manhattan Plaza, at which defendant Winslow Seale was employed as a pharmacist. Plaintiff, a Chase employee, allegedly sustained injuries due to defendant Seale’s improper filling of a drug prescription for a medical condition which, so far as appears, was not work related. Based upon the affidavits submitted and the facts stipulated to by the parties on…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. IsersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Claim of Lemon v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Golini v. NachtigallNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Woods v. DadorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Garcia v. IsersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ruiz v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API