Legal Opinion
Claim of Lemon v. New York City Transit Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1988PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
The familiar issue presented on this appeal is whether claimant’s injuries arose out of and in the course of her employment. We conclude that claimant did not sustain a compensable injury.
Claimant, Mattiel Lemon, was employed as a conductor by the appellant, New York City Transit Authority, a self-insured *326employer (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 50). She was assigned to the Woodlawn IRT No. 4 subway line, which operates between Woodlawn Avenue terminal in The Bronx and New Lots Avenue in Brooklyn. Claimant generally worked between the hours of 7:23 p.m. and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Claim of Davis v. Newsweek MagazineNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Claim of Field v. Charmette Knitted Fabric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Matter of Scholtzhauer v. . C. L. Lunch Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rosen v. First Manhattan BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ziccarelli v. NYU Hospitals CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Timperio v. Bronx-Lebanon Hosp. Ctr.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Mintiks v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.