Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Rouse

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 11, 1953No. 388PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

On this appeal plaintiff relies on her exception to the signing of the judgment entered in the court below. No case on appeal was required. The record proper constitutes the case on appeal. Wilson v. Chandler, ante, p. 401; In re Suggs, ante, p. 413. Hence the motion of defendants to dismiss the appeal for failure of plaintiff to serve a case on appeal is without merit and is denied.

On the original appeal plaintiff argued that (1) she is entitled to judgment in the sum of $1,000; (2) she is entitled to an equitable lien on the combination residence and store building property as security for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perry v. . MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  2. Anderson Cotton Mills v. Royal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Dey v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Holsomback v. HolsombackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Scates v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Gusick v. EymanArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Estate of Loftin v. LoftinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API