Legal Opinion

Gusick v. Eyman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1956No. 6220PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

Appellant Gusick states that this is an appeal by him to this court from an order entered by Judge Thomas sitting in the Superior Court of Pinal County, dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to the mandate of this court in the case of State ex rel. Jones v. Superior Court, 78 Ariz. 367, 280 P.2d 691.

An examination of the decision in that case clearly shows that the questions presented there and the questions presented here are basically the same. The arguments presented in the prior case and all questions raised, including the alleged denial of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SalamonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Mountain Home Lumber Co. v. SwartwoutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State of Arizona v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Woodward v. PerkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Snell v. RuppertWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. BoykinArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. FedericoArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Scates v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. DVM Co. v. Bricker (In Re Bricker)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API