Legal Opinion
Magro v. Lentini Bros. Moving and Storage Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 2, 1971No. 70-C-60PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Decision and Order
MISHLER, Chief Judge.
This is an action based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint states four claims, only the first of which is a federal claim. 1 Jurisdiction over the federal claim is alleged under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The court, in a Memorandum of Decision and Order dated June 8, 1970, found subject matter jurisdiction since the claim could not “ . . .be characterized as wholly insubstantial.” 2
Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment “declaring New York State Uniform Commercial Code Section 7-210 void as violative of the Fourteenth Amendment. ...” (Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adams v. Southern California First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Brooks v. Flagg Brothers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Hernandez v. European Auto Collision, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
- Clara M. Jones v. Banner Moving & Storage, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1974
- George T. Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, Willie O. Hampton and Mattie Hampton, Individually and on Behalf of All Otherssimilarly Situated v. The Bank of California, National Association, a California BankingcorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.