Legal Opinion
Adams v. Southern California First National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1973No. Nos. 72-1484, 72-1888PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRASK, Circuit Judge:
These two cases present appeals from contrary results reached by two district courts on the question of the constitutional due process rights of debtors *326whose property is repossessed by self-help, without formal legal proceedings.
The Adams case is before this court on an interlocutory appeal by the Southern California First National Bank (S. Cal. Bank) from an order of the District Court of the Southern District of California granting Adams’ motion for partial summary judgment.1
The trial court concluded first that •the enactment of sections 9503 and 95042 of the…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Joyce Shirley v. State National Bank of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Richard W. Bosse v. Crowell Collier and MacMillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Allen P. Schlein, M.D. v. The Milford Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.