Legal Opinion

Baird v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 6, 1992No. 90-P-929PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.

In their complaint, the plaintiffs claim that Evelyn J. Baird was injured when she tripped over the stump of what had been a signpost maintained on a public sidewalk in the city of Somerville (city) by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and that her injuries were caused by the negligence of the city and the MBTA. They further allege that Evelyn J. Baird’s husband suffered a loss of consortium and that timely statutory notice pursuant to G. L. c. 84, § 18, was given to the city.

*496The MBTA moved for summary judgment on the basis of lack of notice to it under G. L. c. 84, § 18.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lolos v. BerlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Gallant v. WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Huff v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Ram v. Town of CharltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Trioli v. Town of SudburyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CarelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  2. Lavecchia v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Jordan v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Cedar JunctionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Yetman v. CavanaghMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
  5. Botello v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API