Botello v. Massachusetts Port Authority
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Maria Botello hurt herself in a fall on an icy sidewalk under the control of the Massachusetts Port Authority (Mass-port). When she brought a claim against Massport, her statutory notice was defective, a misstep that might have been inconsequential by reason of a savings provision in G. L. c. 84, § 18, which excludes failure to give proper notice as a defense, unless the defendant proves prejudice. A judge of the Superior Court accepted Massport’s argument that the savings provision of § 18 does not apply to Massport and allowed Massport’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.
These are the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Champigny v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Perry v. MedeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Whalen v. Worcester Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Huff v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. SavageMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nunez v. A&M Rentals, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Landry v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Hall v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2015
- Loan v. Boston Water & Sewer CommissionMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005