Legal Opinion
BNSF Railway Company v. James E. Phillips
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
Decided May 22, 2014No. 02-11-00250-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.
Upon consideration of Appellant BNSF Railway Company’s motions for rehearing and reconsideration en banc, Appellee James E. Phillips’s response, and BNSF’s reply, this court denies the motion for reconsideration en banc in a separate order today, and we deny the motion for rehearing. However, we withdraw our prior opinions and judgment of August 1, 2013 and substitute the following.
BNSF appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a jury verdict awarding Phillips $1,901,820.85 in damages and court costs on his claims for negligence under the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bnsf Railway Company v. James E. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- BNSF Railway Company v. Salvador L. Acosta, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
- Bnsf Railway Company v. James E. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Leija, Antonio Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Leija, Antonio Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.