Legal Opinion

BNSF Railway Company v. Salvador L. Acosta

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided November 7, 2014No. 08-13-00268-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice.

In this permissive interlocutory appeal, BNSF Railway Company challenges the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. We reverse the trial court’s order, render summary judgment in favor of BNSF, and dismiss the case.

FACTUAL SUMMARY

On May 22, 1978, Salvador Acosta began working for BNSF, where he served as a flagman, a machine operator, and a track-man laborer over a 31-year period. Acosta’s last physical day on the job was March 21, 2010.

In two to-whom-it-may-concern letters dated April 28, 2010, Acosta described the pain and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Albert E. Albertson v. T.J. Stevenson & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. George Andrew Lavellee, Jr. v. Carlo Listi, Sheriff, Lafayette Parish, LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. General Universal Systems, Inc. v. Hal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ragland v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Bnsf Railway Company v. James E. Phillips, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015
  3. Soledad Moreno v. Karen Tidwell, Individually and as Independent of the Estates of Robert L. Gibson Jr. and Mary Lou Gibson and Sharon Snow, Individually and as Independent of the Estates of Robert L. Gibson Jr. and Mary Lou Gibson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API