Legal Opinion

MacQueen v. Huntington Ingalls Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 30, 2015No. Civ. No. 13-831-SLR/CJBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Sue L. Robinson, United States District Judge

At Wilmington this 30th day of September, 2015, having reviewed the objections filed to the December 3, 2014 Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke, as well as the supplementary papers filed after the completion of limited jurisdictional discovery; I will affirm the recommendation that the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction filed by defendant Huntington Ingalls Incorporated be granted, as discussed below.

1. Background. The case was brought by plaintiff, Marguerite MacQueen (“plaintiff’),…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd. And Coastal Marketing Associates, Inc. And Schuman, Martin L., JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Provident National Bank v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. EU Automation, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API