Holliday v. Henderson
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
Affidavit and motion, by appellant, for a writ of mandate against the appellee as Auditor of State.
The substantial facts stated in the affidavit of the appellant are as follows:
That he is a citizen of the State, and is, and was at the time of the passage of the act hereinafter named, the proprietor and publisher of “ The Indianapolis News,” a leading daily newspaper, published,in the city of Indianapolis, having a general circulation in the State, and- which he believes was, at the time of the passage of said act, and has since continuously been, one of the leading daily newspapers of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Noyes & Pettingill v. HewittNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Swan v. GrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
- Kisler v. CameronIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wampler v. State ex rel. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Board of Commissioners v. AdlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- State ex rel. Fry v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. Sloan v. WarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Gregg v. State ex rel. BranchIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.