Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Henderson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Affidavit and motion, by appellant, for a writ of mandate against the appellee as Auditor of State.

The substantial facts stated in the affidavit of the appellant are as follows:

That he is a citizen of the State, and is, and was at the time of the passage of the act hereinafter named, the proprietor and publisher of “ The Indianapolis News,” a leading daily newspaper, published,in the city of Indianapolis, having a general circulation in the State, and- which he believes was, at the time of the passage of said act, and has since continuously been, one of the leading daily newspapers of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Noyes & Pettingill v. HewittNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. State ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Swan v. GrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Kisler v. CameronIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wampler v. State ex rel. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Board of Commissioners v. AdlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Fry v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State ex rel. Sloan v. WarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Gregg v. State ex rel. BranchIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API