Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 175 Ohio St.3d 210.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. TAYLOR. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor,
2024-Ohio-1082.] Attorneys—Misconduct—Violation of Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c) for failing to provide truthful answers to questions on license application—Conditionally stayed six-month suspension. (No. 2023-0743—Submitted July 18, 2023—Decided March 27, 2024.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court, No. 2022-048. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondent, John Taylor, of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney
Registrat…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Schuman.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MarkijohnOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibberOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- Disciplinary Counsel v. VanBibberOhio Supreme Court · 2024