Legal Opinion

Sterling Bronze Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 4, 1924No. 2381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Section 304 (a) of Title III of the tariff act of 1922 is as follows:

That every article imported into the United States, which is capable of being marked, stamped, branded, or labeled, without injury, at the time of its manufacture or production, shall be marked, stamped, branded, or labeled, in legible English words, in a conspicuous place that shall not be covered or obscured by any subsequent attachments or arrangements, so as to indicate the country of origin. Said marking, stamping, branding, or labeling shall be as nearly indelible and permanent as the nature of the article will permit.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. May Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Diana v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Estate of BoshellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Kee Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Wiley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Levine Bros. Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  5. West India Fruit & Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API