Smith v. Morgan
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhakdt, Judge.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied, Headnote 1 requiring no elaboration.
As we have indicated, the evidence was voluminous, and a recital of it to demonstrate that the verdict is supported would serve no useful purpose. The general grounds of the motion for *868new trial, the overruling of which is enumerated as error, are without merit.
In the course of the trial plaintiffs tendered a deed in evidence and sought to read the description of the land in it in connection with the interrogation of one of the plaintiffs, who was the grantor in the deed, the grantee being one of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carter v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Gruber v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Seagraves v. SeagravesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Tift v. McCaskillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- McCullough v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sackett v. L. L. Minor Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Alexander v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973