Legal Opinion

Tift v. McCaskill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1930No. Nos. 7538, 7539PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

The main bill of exceptions assigns error on a judgment rendered at an interlocutory hearing, refusing a temporary injunction. The action was instituted by a lessor of certain gasoline and oil filling-stations and the realty on which they were situated, seeking to enjoin the defendants, claiming under the lease, from further use of the property, upon several grounds, one of which was that the contract of lease was unilateral and constituted only a tenancy at will, which had been terminated by the lessor giving the defendants notice to vacate. The contract was signed by the lessor and lessee.…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. A. C. Alexander Lumber Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Wells v. H. W. Lay Company Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Pabian Outdoor-Aiken, Inc. v. DockeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API