Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Rasmussen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1962No. 9690PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs, the Harmons, appeal from a judgment of the trial court of no cause for action in favor of the defendants, the Ras-mussens, respondents here. By their complaint plaintiffs, the Harmons, seek to establish a right of way for an irrigation ditch by prescriptive easement, claiming adverse use for about 60 years and $400 damages for filling in this irrigation ditch. The court found that the Rasmussens did not fill in the ditch, and that the Harmons had abandoned their prescriptive easement.

The Rasmussens’ lot adjoins the south side of 30th South Street for about 360…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Brown v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Jones v. Mutual Creamery Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lovett v. Continental Bank and Trust CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Tuttle v. SowadzkiUtah Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lunt v. LanceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  2. Stern v. Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & SandyUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Shields v. VillarealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Western Gateway Storage Co. v. TresederUtah Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API