Legal Opinion
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 2010No. A10-167PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s declaratory judgment in favor of respondents, arguing that the district court’s ruling is based on an erroneous interpretation of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 327C. Because the district court correctly determined that section 327C.02, subdivision 2, does not impose a reasonableness requirement on increases in manufactured-home-park-lot rental rates and that section 327C.05, subdivision 1, which prohibits a park owner from engaging in an unreasonable course of conduct, does not apply to increases in manufactured-home-park-lot rental…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- DeLaTorre v. Minnesota State High School LeagueDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Landmark Community Bank, N.A. v. John D. KlingelhutzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Ellis v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018