State v. Cawood
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J.,
delivered the opinion of the court,
in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.
The controversy here concerns certain audio and videotapes which were introduced in a bench trial and marked as exhibits. Following this Court’s rejection of the State’s application for Rule 11 review, the Court of Criminal Appeals, on motion of the appellee, entered an order returning this evidence to the “permanent possession” of the appellee. The issue framed and briefed by the parties requires us to determine…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cynthia Bloch and Thomas Bloch v. Sheriff L. John RibarCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Northland Insurance Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Doe v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Konvalinka v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital AuthorityTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. StrodeTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Swift v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Schneider v. City of JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Peck v. TannerTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.