Legal Opinion

Levy v. Rothe

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, from a judgment for the plaintiff which was rendered by the District Court in the city of Hew York for the eighth judicial district upon the verdict'of a jury. Action to recover commissions for the sale of real property.

1Opinion of the CourtBisohoef, J.

The defendant’s employment of the plaintiff, a real estate broker, was evidenced by the following writing: “In consideration of the sum of one dollar to me in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged and of other good and valuable considerations, I do hereby give unto Daniel Levy, of the city of Mew York, the option and sole agency to sell and offer for sale the premises Mo. 257 West Thirtieth street in the city of Mew York, about 24 x 140, for the period of six months, from the date hereof, and hereby agree not to place the said premises for sale during the said period in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moses v. . BierlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Flanagan v. FoxNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  3. Golden Gate Packing Co. v. Farmers' UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Schultz v. GriffinSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blumenthal v. BridgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Cloe v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Gaillard Realty Co. v. Rogers Wire Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Slattery v. CothranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Rudisill Soil Pipe Co. v. Eastham Soil Pipe & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API