Rudisill Soil Pipe Co. v. Eastham Soil Pipe & Foundry Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, 3.
The bill prayed injunction to stay foreclosure of a mortgage securing an issue of bonds, and for an accounting. The temporary injunction was granted. Respondents filed verified answer, supported by affidavits, and moved to dissolve. Counter affidavits were filed for complainant; and on submission thereon the motion to dissolve was denied, from which the appeal was taken.
The trial judge classified the insistences of complainant as follows: (1) That the acquisition of the bonds constituted an usurious transaction; (2) the lease obligates the Rudisill Soil Pipe Company to apply profits…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Nelson v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Hodges Bros. v. Coleman & CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Moore & Handley Hardware Co. v. Towers Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Ulmer v. Lime Rock RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crigler v. SalacSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Ellingson v. World Amusement Service Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Bowdoin Square, LLC v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Fegaro v. South Central BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.