Legal Opinion

State v. Vigil

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1985No. 8127PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARCIA, Judge.

Defendant was tried on three counts of criminal sexual contact with a minor, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-9-13 (Repl.Pamp.1984). A guilty verdict was returned on two counts. The jury was unable to reach a unanimous decision as to the third count, and a mistrial was declared as to that count.

On appeal, defendant raises four issues: 1) whether the use of a videotape deposition violates standards prescribed by NMSA 1978, Section 30-9-17 (Repl.Pamp. 1984), and NMSA 1978, Crim.P. Rule 29.1 (Repl.Pamp.1985), and whether the use of a videotape deposition violates…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. ManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wildermuth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Hosford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. LudwigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. McGuire v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API