Legal Opinion

State v. Elward

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 20, 2015No. 2014AP2569-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1. In this case, we must decide whether a mandatory $200 DNA surcharge imposed on misdemeanants is an unconstitutional ex post facto violation given the facts at hand. We hold that, as applied to a distinct class of defendants, the law created an ex post facto punishment. The State concedes this point, but we have decided to write an opinion anyway because we are unsure how large the class is.

¶ 2. On July 1, 2013, the legislature published 2013 Wis. Act 20. In part, this law imposed a $200 DNA surcharge for defendants found guilty of misdemeanors. 2013 Wis. Act 20, § 2355. The Act called…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Tobin Mueller v. Rick RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. State v. HainesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Singh v. KemperCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Tabitha A. ScruggsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. RadajCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
  3. State Ex Rel. Singh v. KemperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. Jamal L. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API