State v. Haines
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Bablitch, J.
¶ 1. "[I]t is one thing to revive a prosecution already dead, and another to give it a longer lease of life." Falter v. United States, 23 F.2d 420, 425-26 (2d Cir. 1928).
¶ 2. At issue in this case is whether an extension of the time limit for prosecuting a child sexual assault violates the ex post facto clause of the Wisconsin Constitution when the statute of limitations is extended before the prior time limitation for prosecution has expired. We agree with the court of appeals 1 and hold that it does not.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 3. The relevant facts are undisputed. On July 24, 2000,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- People v. RussoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Borello v. U.S. Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- United States v. GrimesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Society Insurance v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PicotteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. Tabitha A. ScruggsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. ElwardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
- State v. MacArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.