James Wilkett, Thomas H. Conklin, Jr., and Joe F. Hoover, Defendants v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
We here consider three consolidated appeals, all of which involve the former jeopardy provision of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The issue as to defendants-appellants Conklin and Hoover are similar, if not the same. The problems in the case of Wilkett are different from those present in the Conklin and Hoover cause. Therefore, the latter two defendants will be first considered and we will take up Wilkett thereafter.
Part I
United States v. Conklin and Hoover
The ultimate issue to be determined is whether the defendants are entitled…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- State v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. Quentin T. Wiles, United States of America v. Patrick J. SchleibaumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Richard Dean MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Clarence Edwin Rinke, and Duane Keith NevinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.