Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence Edwin Rinke, and Duane Keith Nevins
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1985No. 85-1233, 85-1234PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Clarence Rinke (Rinke) and Duane Nevins (Nevins) 1 appeal their convictions and sentences for violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, conspiracy to distribute marijuana. Defendant Nevins also appeals from his conviction and sentence for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3) (the Travel Act), travel in interstate commerce with intent to promote, manage or carry on an unlawful activity.
In April of 1982, Carl Frederick Pieper (Pieper) became a cooperating informant for the Orlando, Florida, Police Department for the purpose of assisting the police in prosecuting a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Graham Lee KendallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Linette Perez, United States of America v. Juancho Alcantera, United States of America v. Edmundo BatoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Marmon Dennis RecordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. CardallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.