Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hunter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1989No. 02174PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment of sentence for terroristic threats, rape, burglary, theft by unlawful taking, simple assault and indecent assault. Appellant contends that trial counsel was ineffective for (1) moving for a mistrial; (2) failing to consult him prior to moving for a mistrial; (3) failing to urge his discharge on double jeopardy grounds prior to his second trial; and (4) failing to argue at the suppression hearing that appellant’s mother should not have served as an “interested adult” because she had a conflict of interest. We disagree, and for the reasons that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RightleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. BalogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. BalogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API