Commonwealth v. Balog
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
In this case we are asked to decide whether the trial court abused its discretion when it ordered a mistrial, over defense counsel’s objections, as a result of Appellant/Defendant’s statement that his co-conspirator had been found not guilty in an earlier trial. Because we find that there was no “manifest necessity” to order a mistrial, we reverse the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to dismiss, and order the instant action dismissed on the basis that Appellant’s re-prosecution would violate the Double Jeopardy provisions of the United States and Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McCordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- In the Interest of MorrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. PhillippiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.