Legal Opinion

State v. Calkins

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1941No. 6951PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

— Murl Calkins was informed against and tried in the district court in and for Shoshone County for the crime of murder. His defense was, that at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, he was insane. He was convicted of manslaughter and appeals.

It is strenuously, and we conclude, correctly, insisted the trial court committed reversible error by instructing the jury that

“The law presumes mental capacity and responsibility unless the fact is proved otherwise by a preponderance of the evidence. (Italics ours.) If you believe from the evidence that the defendant, at the time that he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rea v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. CopenbargerIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. BowkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. State v. HinesIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. AyresIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State v. ScottIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Johnson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Cobas v. ClappIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API