Legal Opinion

Holzman v. De Escamilla

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1948No. Civ. 3671PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal by James L. Russell and H. W. Andrews from a judgment decreeing they were general partners in Hacienda Farms Limited, a limited partnership, from February 27 to December 1,1943, and as such were liable as general partners to the creditors of the partnership.

Early in 1943, Hacienda Farms Limited was organized as a limited partnership (Civ. Code, §§ 2477 et seq.), with Ricardo de Escamilla as the general partner and James L. Russell and H. W. Andrews as limited partners.

The partnership went into bankruptcy in December, 1943, and Lawrence Holzman was appointed and qualified as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tyler v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Grainger v. AntoyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Toor v. Westover. Toor v. WestoverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Plasteel Products Corporation v. Clifton E. Helman, TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  4. Delaney v. Fidelity Lease LimitedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Bergeson v. Life Insurance Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API