Legal Opinion

Plasteel Products Corporation v. Clifton E. Helman, Trustees

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 5, 1959No. 5539PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts entered following the allowance of appellees’ motions for summary judgment.

Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation, sued appellees, among others, all Massachusetts citizens, as “co-partners doing business as Copley Steel Products Company” for $6,555.29 as unpaid balance for merchandise sold and delivered to Copley. Several of the defendants filed motions for summary judgment on the ground that they were limited partners only, and submitted uncontradicted supporting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grainger v. AntoyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Rathke v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Gilman Paint & Varnish Co. v. LegumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  4. Holzman v. De EscamillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Limouze v. M. M. & P. Maritime Advancement, Training, Education & Safety ProgramDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
  2. Gast v. PETSINGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1996
  4. Delaney v. Fidelity Lease LimitedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Weil v. Diversified PropertiesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API