Legal Opinion
Mandle v. KELLY
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1956No. 40273PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.
Appellant filed claim for compensation under the Mississippi Workmen’s Compensation Act. The facts are not in dispute.
R. 0. Kelly, one of the appellees, operated a cannery at Midville, Georgia, and regularly employed more than eight employees. No business was conducted by the employer outside of Georgia, hut he operated two tractor-trailer truck units in delivering the products of his cannery to various points outside the State of Georgia. Appellant and one other employee were employed to operate these trucks. The employer consigned a truck load of the product of his cannery to a point in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- Hutzell v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Thomas v. Transport Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Travelers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Boyle v. G. & K. TRUCKING CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.