Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Turlock Irrigation District v. Hetrick

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1999No. F027535PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUCKLEY, J.

Facts

Appellant Turlock Irrigation District (TID) is an irrigation district formed and existing under Water Code section 20500 et seq. TID provides water and electricity to municipal, industrial, commercial and residential customers within Merced, Stanislaus and Tuolumne Counties.

Intervener Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is a public utility which provides natural gas to customers in TID’s service area. PG&E offers a gas aggregation program permitting “core transport agents” to “aggregate” their customers’ natural gas requirements and then purchase the gas and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. TannerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State of California v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Rock Creek Water District v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Merced Irrigation District v. Superior Court of Merced CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Consolidated Irrigation District v. City of SelmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Lamere v. the Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API