Legal Opinion

Lamere v. the Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 2005No. E036474PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, Acting P. J. —

Petitioners, defendants in the trial court, are members of the Enrollment Committee of the Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Indian Reservation, commonly known as the Pechanga Band (Band). Real parties in interest (real parties), plaintiffs below, were enrolled members of the Band at the time of the commencement of this action.

According to the complaint, defendants have initiated “disenrollment procedures” against plaintiffs on the general ground that the ancestor from whom plaintiffs claimed descent was not one of the “original Pechanga…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Salazar v. EastinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Catchpole v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Sammis v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cal. Dui Lawyers Ass'n v. Cal. Dep't of Motor Vehicles, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Healy Lake Village v. Mt. McKinley BankAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Brown v. Garcia, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. TIMBISHA SHOSHONE TRIBE v. KennedyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API