Legal Opinion

Rush v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1900No. 2979PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane: County. — Hon. William E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

In April, 1897, the respondent, James Rush, was in the employ of the Spokane Ealls & Northern Railway Company, appellant, in the capacity of a *504common laborer, and was engaged with others in riprapping and repairing its road bed in the vicinity of Marcus and Bossburg, in this state. It was the duty of the respondent, in the course of his employment, to load and unload rock, which was transported on appellant’s cars from a quarry near the railroad track to places where it was needed. Dynamite or giant powder was used in blasting rock at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Allend v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Tissue v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Allison v. Western N. C. R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Marietta Torpedo Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bitzan v. ParisiWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gallamore v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Lusk v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Grant v. HuschkeWashington Supreme Court · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API